#Nba statbook 2017 free

A team who scores a lot is not necessarily better. Four Factors? I Mean Eight…ĭespite Oliver coining the term “Four Factors,” this process is actually eight factors. This measure is simply to calculate the percentage of possessions that ended in a turnover. This is a simple measurement called turnover percentage (TO%).

#Nba statbook 2017 free

The final step of the four factors is to ensure that, other than a defensive rebound, a field goal attempt or free throw attempt terminates the possession. For the 2017 NBA season, the worst team was the Brooklyn Nets (0.8401) while the best team was the Detroit Pistons (0.9414). This is due to the fact that most teams average just under a field goal attempt per possession. The reason the comparison is to FGA instead of Number of Possessions is unknown. To measure a team’s quality of getting to the foul line is to identify the number of free throws made per field goal attempt, called the free throw rate (FTRate). Converting said attempts into points becomes the most important part of the equation. Second, it inches opponents ever closer to being out of the game. First, it guarantees attempts to score points. Getting to the foul line serves two purposes in a game. The next way to score points other than scoring a field goal or giving the team a second opportunity is to get to the foul line. For the Raptors, their OREB% for the 2017 season is 0.24957. Whichever reason, this is why we do not divide by the number of field goal misses. These can be attributed to dead ball rebounds, fouls before a rebound is secured, and expiration of period. This leaves 217 missed field goal attempts out of the picture. Despite this, the Raptors missed 3,707 field goal attempts. The Toronto Raptors in the 2017 NBA season managed 871 offensive rebounds while giving up 2,619 defensive rebounds. Note that this value is not over the number of missed field goal attempts. This quantity is calculated as the number of offensive rebounds divided by the number of available rebounds after a missed field goal attempt.

To measure the quality of a team’s ability to rebound, we simply compute the offensive rebounding percentage (OREB%). This is effectively a “do-over” for teams and when strategized around properly, can be a deadly plan of attack for a team. An offensive rebound extends a possession and allows for a second attempt at a field goal. If a team cannot score on every possession, then the optimal task is to grab every miss and give the team a second-chance opportunity. However, with eFG% we do obtain the best relative measurement for points per field goal attempt simple by multiplying by two. For instance, you cannot determine the type of team (block vs. Note, however, eFG% cannot be taken alone. The scale correction is to account for three point field goals. This measure is a scale corrected measure to identify field goal percentage for a team. Oliver proposed using effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%). However, teams are never ideal and we are left with attempting to identify the best way to measure scoring in the NBA. An ideal team will always score, every time. This rule is the simplest of all and tends to be one of the hardest. Hence we will focus on the main four ways to terminate a possession. These are few and far between and rarely impact possession data over the course of a season. There are other options such as dead ball rebounds, end of period, and specialized fouling situations. Each of these elements are closely related to the termination of a possession for a team. The four factors are to score efficiently, protect the basketball on offense, grab as many rebounds as possible, and get to the foul line as often as possible. Four Factors: Score, Protect, Crash, and Attack In this article, we quickly walk through the four factors, illustrate their utility within the game and then compare a statistical and a mathematical model to identify the relationship between success and the four factors of the game. The novelty of understanding these factors appear in the way of analytic development in an effort to shed light on emphasis of each factor. These strategies are nothing new, as these were drilled into my head from coaches dating back to the early 90’s. In 2004, Dean Oliver expanded upon his “Four Factors” philosophy from his 2002 book, Basketball on Paper, in an attempt to identify how four important strategies relate to success in basketball.